written by Batzertzul 252 days ago
Rating: 0
| Rate Comment:+-
@TB
I've already listened to Blue Plz (I listen to every episode very religiously).. Seriously, who doesn't!?
I was just saying that it didn't matter if your argument are base on well researched information or if you are just being a jerk about the coming change, QQ is still QQ.
And, while that post is very informative, I did buff it, there is still the QQ feeling about it.
BTW TB, did you "cancel" your account when BC came out? Cause this is nothing Blizz hasn't done before.
Bad players will be bad players no matter what gear you put on them.
/hug
written by TotalBiscuit 252 days ago
Rating: 1
| Rate Comment:+-
I'm pretty sure I covered why it's not the same as the TBC badge debacle. If I didn't on the show, it was certainly covered in the extensive discussion on our forums as well as other shows.
QQ is entirely subjective. I rarely if I ever use that term for that very reason, it's just so much of a cop-out, just like calling someone who disagrees with ya a 'troll'.
written by Arioch 252 days ago
Rating: 1
| Rate Comment:+-
"QQ is entirely subjective. I rarely if I ever use that term for that very reason, it's just so much of a cop-out, just like calling someone who disagrees with ya a 'troll'." - TotalBiscuit
Thank you.
I've been a little confused about how just voicing a differing opinion can be construed as QQ. I prefer to save that term for the Chicken Littles and those threatening to quit if things don't get fixed their way.
Any article that's against the 3.2 emblem change really needs to bring up the way Badges of Justice used to work. Without that comparison, it really just reads as QQ to me because these folks seem to lack the experience of what impact Badges had last Expansion and that Badges actually were easier to get and gave better gear than this Emblem change will in the future.
written by Vidi 252 days ago
Rating: 1
| Rate Comment:+-
I don't think this article is QQ at all but someone who was simply expressing their doubts over a coming change. Reread the article and you'll see he states that his opinion isn't a "strong" one which I took to mean he was asking for a differing opinion to convince him, which is why I posted there. Anyone seeking an intelligent debate should be applauded, not bashed with the QQ hammer. This isn't the Warcraft forums, let's not turn it into that.
written by veneretio 252 days ago
Rating: 0
| Rate Comment:+-
You're right, QQ comes off stronger than I intended. My point is I want this article from someone that's experienced TBC because without that it's a lot of guessing and not understanding that they've already tried and tested this system.
written by Arioch 252 days ago
Rating: 0
| Rate Comment:+-
Of all my posts to link here it had to be this one? Why not the one about my new hair color or the one where I spend all day in SM GY healing a tank wielding an arclight spanner? >.<
I will have a new post up tomorrow that hopefully clarifies my position.
Buff'd brings you news from across the Internet that is relevant to World of Warcraft players. What's unique is that the information is provided by players and submitted here to be voted on.
Comments
You really couldn't be more wrong on that one. It's easy to call QQ on things you don't agree with, harder to dispute them with actual facts.
http://wcradio.com/shows/6-Blue-Plz-/episodes/1594 - listen and learn.
@TB
I've already listened to Blue Plz (I listen to every episode very religiously).. Seriously, who doesn't!?
I was just saying that it didn't matter if your argument are base on well researched information or if you are just being a jerk about the coming change, QQ is still QQ.
And, while that post is very informative, I did buff it, there is still the QQ feeling about it.
BTW TB, did you "cancel" your account when BC came out? Cause this is nothing Blizz hasn't done before.
Bad players will be bad players no matter what gear you put on them.
/hug
I'm pretty sure I covered why it's not the same as the TBC badge debacle. If I didn't on the show, it was certainly covered in the extensive discussion on our forums as well as other shows.
QQ is entirely subjective. I rarely if I ever use that term for that very reason, it's just so much of a cop-out, just like calling someone who disagrees with ya a 'troll'.
"QQ is entirely subjective. I rarely if I ever use that term for that very reason, it's just so much of a cop-out, just like calling someone who disagrees with ya a 'troll'." - TotalBiscuit
Thank you.
I've been a little confused about how just voicing a differing opinion can be construed as QQ. I prefer to save that term for the Chicken Littles and those threatening to quit if things don't get fixed their way.
I don't think this article is QQ at all but someone who was simply expressing their doubts over a coming change. Reread the article and you'll see he states that his opinion isn't a "strong" one which I took to mean he was asking for a differing opinion to convince him, which is why I posted there. Anyone seeking an intelligent debate should be applauded, not bashed with the QQ hammer. This isn't the Warcraft forums, let's not turn it into that.
You're right, QQ comes off stronger than I intended. My point is I want this article from someone that's experienced TBC because without that it's a lot of guessing and not understanding that they've already tried and tested this system.
Of all my posts to link here it had to be this one? Why not the one about my new hair color or the one where I spend all day in SM GY healing a tank wielding an arclight spanner? >.<
I will have a new post up tomorrow that hopefully clarifies my position.